Stilfragen: Grundlegungen zu einer Geschichte der Ornamentik (German Edition) [Alois Riegl] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. This is a. Stilfragen by Alois Riegl, , available at Book Depository with free delivery worldwide. Stilfragen Grundlegungen Zu Einer Geschichte Der Ornamentik has 11 ratings and 2 reviews. M said: Alois Riegl discussed the evolution of ornament by trac.
|Published (Last):||12 June 2016|
|PDF File Size:||20.88 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.72 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
He traced these processes by observing ornamental works of different periods from Egyptians, Mycaneans, Greek, Roman, etc.
In the picture that Riegl draws of the development the changes of style are meaningful in a specific way; continuity is not merely carrying on; every stylistic phase creates its own problems which are solved in the succeeding one, only to create new conflicts for which new answers have to be found.
In the most famous section of this chapter, Riegl argued that acanthus ornament was not derived from the acanthus plantas had been believed since the time of Vitruviusbut was rather a sculptural adaptation of the palmette motif. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
The arabesque is understood here as a rieegl version of earlier systems of tendril ornament, thereby establishing a “genetic relationship between the ornamental Islamic tendril and its direct predecessor, the tendril ornament of antiquity. Sally rated it it was amazing Nov 30, Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst slois imperfections present in the aged copy.
In the book, Riegl traced moments where the basic motif lotus diverged to form recognizably new motifs. Marcos marked it as to-read Apr 05, After this “invention of line,” the cave-dwellers proceeded to arrange lines “according to the principles of rhythm and symmetry.
Stilfragen : Grundlegungen Zu Einer Geschichte Der Ornamentik – Primary Source Edition
The reader will learn about lotus, tendril, volute, palmette and acanthus motifs, which are ultimately one and the same ornament i. This position is argued in explicit opposition to that of the “technical-materialist” school, according to which “all art forms were always the direct products of materials and techniques”  and that ornamental “motifs originated spontaneously throughout the world at a number regl different locations.
Bryan Daily marked sitlfragen as to-read Apr 25, Return to Book Page. This association is, however, no more justified than the one made between contemporary Darwinism and Darwin. The first chapter, “The Stilfragrn Style,” argues that geometric ornament originated, not from such technical processes as wickerwork and weaving, but rather from an “immanent artistic drive, alert and restless for action, that human beings possessed long before they invented woven protective coverings for their bodies.
Courtney added it May 04, Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. Grundlegungen zu einer Geschichte der Ornamentik is a book on the history of ornament by the Austrian art zlois Alois Riegl.
It was published in Berlin in Giebt es denn stilfrage eine Geschichte der Ornamentik? Elie added it Jul 25, Anton Lapov marked it as to-read Mar 11, This ornament, he argued, developed from attempts to represent natural forms in two dimensions, which gave rise to the idea of an outline.
It was therefore “a product of pure artistic invention,”  and not of “a simple compulsion to make direct copies of living organisms. Kawakoala marked it as to-read Sep 28, In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. One of them was that if one viewed art history in this way, absolute aesthetic norms became obsolete and had to be dropped.
Haely Yoon marked it as to-read Sep 21, A view with most serious implications. Ann rated it really liked it Apr 08, The English translation renders the title as Problems of style: Es ist dies eine Frage, die selbst in unserem von laois Forschungseifer ganz erfullten Zeitalter eine unbedingt bejahencle Antwort wenigstens bisher clurchaus noch nicht gefunden hat. Views Read Edit View history.
Stilfragen : Alois Riegl :
Open Preview See a Problem? Stildragen Stilfragen remains a fundamental work in the history of ornament, and has heavily influenced the work of Paul Jacobsthal and Ernst Gombrichamong others who have addressed the same themes.
However, Riegl consistently disassociates Semper’s followers from Semper himself, writing that. Ana marked it as to-read Jan 21, Highly recommend this book to anyone interested to discover ‘how’ and ‘where’ ornaments come from, from the very basic Egyptian ‘lotus’ motif to the complex Islamic ‘Arabesque’.
Man braucht dabei gar nicht an jene Radikalen zu denken, die uberhaupt alles ornamentale Kunstschakfen fur originell erklaren, eine jede Erscheinung auf dem Gebiete der dekorativen Kunste als unmittelbares Produkt aus dem jeweilig gegebenen Stoff und Zweck ansehen mochten. Mirinda marked it as to-read Sep 04, Thanks for telling us about the problem. Gombrich, The sense of order London, Alois Riegl discussed the evolution of ornament by tracing how the basic element ‘lotus’ developed historically through different civilizations and how the artistic developments accumulated into Islamic Arabesque.
The fourth chapter, “The Arabesque ,” continues the development of the previous chapter through late antique and early Byzantine and into Islamic art. The Stilfragen is divided into an introduction, which sets out the purpose of the work, and four chapters, each on a theme in the history of artistic style.
Here Riegl argues that motifs such as the lotus floweralthough they may originally have been endowed by the Egyptians with symbolic significance, were adopted by other cultures that “no longer understood their hieratic meaning,”  and thereby became purely decorative.
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Carla Mary rated it it was amazing Nov 02, The theory of the technical, materialist origin of the earliest ornaments shilfragen usually attributed to Gottfried Semper.